Minimally-Invasive Neuromodulation

Invasive neuromodulatory approaches alleviate the symptoms of many neurological conditions, but they require brain surgery. We are currently investigating the viability of multiple different approaches to modulate deep brain targets without surgical entry, including directed electromagnetic fields and temporal interfering currents applied transcranialy or transduraly. While deep focal activation via distant electrodes was previously considered computationally unrealistic, our lab has generated substantial evidence demonstrating that appropriate multi-frequency envelopes can indeed modulate neural activity at depth. This work involves rigorous optimization of electrode placement and current steering to ensure that the maximum field intensity is localized precisely within the target volume, minimizing off-target effects in the superficial cortex.

Lee W, Faeghi P, Dorval AD, Walling JS (2024). “Wireless beamforming for electromagnetic field focusing in brain tissue.” Proc of Euro Microwave Conf, 489-492, IEEE:10732534.

Rampersad S, Roig-Solvas B, Yarossi M, Kulkarni PP, Santarnecchi E, Dorval AD, Brooks D (2019). “Prospects for transcranial temporal interference stimulation in humans: A computational study.”NeuroImage, 15(202):116124, PMC:68129277.

Real-Time Bidirectional Interfaces

Traditional neuromodulation typically operates in an open-loop fashion, providing a constant drive regardless of the patient's immediate physiological state. However, bidirectional interfaces can both sense and stimulate in a dynamic, closed-loop architecture. By integrating neurophysiologic sensing with focused modulation, we are building adaptive frameworks that bridge the gap between experimental approaches and robust, clinically viable therapies. This work often leverages the Real-Time eXperiment Interface (RTXI), a high-performance software platform we helped develop to manage the rigorous timing requirements of hard real-time electrophysiological applications. Combining computational optimization with subject-specific feedback will enable responsive and highly personalized therapies in the next generation of neural interfaces.

Bicer Y, Hall J, Rampersad S, Brooks D, Dorval AD, Yarossi M (2025). “A real-time optimization-based approach to phase-specific triggering during transcranial current stimulation.” Proc IEEE Neural Engineering Research, in press.

Polar CA, Gupta R, Lehmkuhle MJ, Dorval AD (2018). “Correlation between cortical beta power and gait speed is suppressed in a parkinsonian model, but restored by therapeutic deep brain stimulation.” Neurobiology of Disease, 117:137-148, PMID:29859320.

Patel YA, George A, Dorval AD, White JA, Chistini DJ, Butera RJ (2017) “Hard real-time closed-loop electrophysiology with Real-Time eXperiment Interface (RTXI).” PLoS Comput Biol, 13(7):e1005656, PMC:5469488.

Ortega FA, Butera RJ, Christini DJ, White JA,  Dorval AD (2014) “Dynamic clamp in cardiac and neuronal systems using RTXI.” Methods in Molecular Biology: Patch Clamp, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 1183:327-354, PMC:4880480.

Neuroengineering Devices

The clinical success of neuromodulation is fundamentally constrained by the resolution of the physical interface between technology and biology. Traditional electrodes often lack the spatial granularity required to selectively engage specific neural pathways without affecting adjacent structures. To address this, we are developing advanced hardware architectures, including high-density, charge-steering arrays such as the µDBS. By utilizing novel electrode geometries with thousands of individually controllable contacts, we can implement computational field shaping to accommodate surgical targeting errors and optimize the recruitment of small-diameter fibers. Our work spans the entire development pipeline—from the fabrication and bench testing of these high-resolution probes to the design of application-specific customizable architectures. These next-generation neural interfaces provide the necessary precision to shift from broad, regional stimulation toward highly targeted, patient-specific circuit modulation.

Anderson DN, Anderson CB, Lanka N, Sharma R, Butson CR, Baker BB, Dorval AD (2019). “The µDBS: multiresolution directional deep brain stimulation from improved targeting of small diameter fibers.” Front Neurosci, 13:1152, PMC:6828644.

Willsie AC, Dorval AD (2015) “Computational field shaping for deep brain stimulation with thousands of contacts in a novel electrode geometry.” Neuromodulation 18(7):542-551, PMID:26245306.

Willsie AC, Dorval AD (2015) “Fabrication and initial testing of the μDBS: a novel deep brain stimulation electrode with thousands of individually controllable contacts.” Biomed Microdevices 17(3):58, PMID:25981752.

Willsie AC, Dorval AD (2013) “Charge steering in a novel DBS electrode may accommodate surgical targeting errors.” Proc IEEE Neural Eng Res 152-153, doi:10.1109/NER.2013.6695894.

Sharma R, Tathireddy P, Lee S, Reith L, Bamberg E, Dorval AD, Normann R, Solzbacher F (2011) “Application-specific customizable architectures of Utah neural interfaces.” Procedia Engineering 25:1016-1019. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.250.